Progressives always accuse their opponents of being ‘fascists’, when in fact their opponents are libertarians. This is demonstrated by examing a bona fide political spectrum.
Fascism requires a high tax regime to fund an authoritarian centralised state apparatus which imposes rigid, all-pervasive, ideological control over its citizenry. It is similar in nature to a communist structure. In both societies, dissent is not tolerated. .
On the other hand, libertarians desire a low taxation, less invasive form of government where personal freedom, and the freedom to criticise government policy, is permitted.
Progressives are being ‘confused’ by deliberate attempts to skew the depiction of the ‘political spectrum’. We are told that the political spectrum has Labour on the left, and Conservatives on the right. We are also informed that the respective extremes of each party are far left communism and far right fascism. This concept is demonstrated by the following graphic:
Any objective observer will notice the inherent bias of the drafter. Firstly, conservatism is shown as having no social welfare schemes, when this is manifestly untrue. Secondly, Fascism is portrayed as rule by a dictator, whereas communism is sympathetically portrayed as rule by people’s representatives in committees. Can you imagine the people of Russia or China voting Stalin or Mao out of office?
Not only does the diagram portray socialism in an unjustly favourable light, the author’s concept of the political spectrum is entirely skewed. A political spectrum should show the entire range of differing political views on a single axis. However, the author of the above schematic fails to show this, and instead adopted the concept show below:
However, this pictorial does not show the full scope of differing political views – which range from a system of 100% tax and total control (totalitarianism) on the true left, to a no tax/no control system (libertarianism) on the true right. This concept is depicted in the following graphic:
The final graphic shows a more detailed analysis of a political spectrum based on degree of taxation/government control. On the far right is a society of total freedom where anything goes. Meanwhile, sharing the far left are the totalitarian twins of communism and fascism. This is the true political spectrum, and it helps explain the term ‘National Socialism’ in the context of 1930’s German fascism.
Not only are we misled into believing that communism and fascism are at opposite ends of the political spectrum, we are also told we live in a representative democracy. This is another political fabrication designed to create a false perception of reality.
On all long term strategic issues, the major political parties are in full alignment. For example, they all want the UK to continue participating in the globalist plans put forward by the likes of the UN, the EU, World Bank, NATO, Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-lateral Commission etc. And they all favour big centralised wholly-invasive government, mass state surveillance, high taxation, rigid state educational indoctrination, open borders, mass migration and degradation of national sovereignty.
Because of the First Past the Post system, political parties with different ideas are unable to break into the system and thereby gain the critical mass necessary to change the UK’s political destiny. In the 2015 election, populist UKIP received 12.6% of the vote, but secured only one seat in Parliament, whereas the globalist Conservative Party received 36.8% of the vote, and secured 331 seats.
The entrenched political establishment tell the masses that this system is a representative democracy when in fact, it is only an illusion of democracy.
The basic ruse is to convince voters that their political system has essentially two competing political parties from opposite ends of the political spectrum, each presenting opposing ideals and policies. One on the Left, the other on the Right. When, after so many years in power, the voters become disillusioned with the incumbent party, they are urged to throw them out and replace them with the other party. Because the few minor differences between the parties are magnified beyond all reason, voters actually believe they are in for real change when in fact no change takes place and the globalist bandwagon rolls on. Such is the power of the forces behind this charade, they are able to practice their deception right under the noses of the electorate, and no more than one in a thousand are aware of it.
With Brexit, and the establishment’s unrelenting assault upon the democratically expressed will of the British people, voters have finally witnessed this deception first hand. Many more are now aware that the only ‘party’ allowed to govern in the UK’s one-party state is the Globalist Party.
21st Century Feudalism
The notion of the UK being a democracy is further shattered when we consider the manner in which politicians work with, and for, the international banking/corporate cartel.
When banks loan money to a business, to protect their interest, they get to have a say in how the business is run. The same applies to countries that borrow money from international finance. The more money borrowed, the greater control financiers exert. This is why increasing the National Debt is bad for democracy.
When in 1976 the UK had to go cap in hand to the International Monetary Fund, the bank imposed a £2.5 billion cut in public spending which completely changed the government’s economic and social policy. Irrespective of the façade of democracy, foreign bankers were openly running the UK.
When global financial institutions conduct significant levels of business in states, or invest in government development programmes or advance them credit, they too exercise a great deal of covert control over government policy.
There are dozens of large financial institutions exercising varying degrees of power over governments. Let us briefly consider Goldman Sachs.
The current Greek debt crisis was exacerbated years earlier by a deal made between the Greek Government and Goldman Sachs, who helped hide the true extent of the nations debt, and in the process almost doubled it.
Arranging a secret loan of 2.8 billion euros for Greece, which was disguised as an off-the-books “cross-currency swap”, about 2 percent of Greece’s debt magically disappeared from its national accounts. For its services, Goldman received 600 million euros.
After the 9/11 attacks, bond yields plunged and because of the formula Goldman used to compute the countrys debt repayments under the swap, Greece suffered a huge loss. By 2005, Greece owed almost double what it had put into the deal, pushing its off-the-books debt from 2.8 billion euros to 5.1 billion.
Recently, that debt was restructured by the European Central Bank, and locked into Greece’s crippling debt repayment plan. You will be unsurprised to learn that European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi (who restructured the Greek debt crisis) was managing director of Goldman Sachs international when the original Goldman deal was brokered with Greece. (How Goldman Sachs profited from the Greek debt Crisis. Robert B Reich 2015 (The Nation))
Did Greece learn its lesson? Today, Petros Christodoulou (who was formerly the General Manager of the Public Debt Management Agency of Greece ) and is now the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the National Bank of Greece, is a Goldman Sachs man.
As the current CEO of Goldman Sachs receives a 24 million dollar bonus, the people of Greece struggle to buy food and medicine. Meanwhile, the international banking cartel will be running the indebted Greek economy for the next few decades. Welcome to a world run by and for the banking/corporate elite.
This is just one example of how international finance controls a countries destiny. Goldman Sachs has people in positions of power throughout the world. For example, Ziad Bahaa-Eldin – Deputy Prime Minister of Egypt, is Goldman. So to is Malcolm Turnbull – recently deposed Prime Minister of Australia. So is Ian Macfarlane, the acting Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia. Robert Zoellick, former President of the World Bank is also Goldman.
In fact, the Minister of Finance for Sweden, the Spanish Secretary of State of Economy and Finance, the Governor of the Reserve Bank of South Africa, Nigeria’s minister of finance, the Prime Minister of Italy and the President of the European Commission have all been Goldman.
Today, Mark Patterson – Chief of Staff to the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, Steven Mnuchin, Current United States Secretary of the Treasury and William C. Dudley – President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York are all Goldman.
Even our own Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, is Goldman. So is Michael Cohrs – Member of Court and the Financial Policy Committee at the Bank of England and so too is the banks Deputy Governor for Monetary Policy, Ben Broadbent.
Goldmann Sachs wants the UK to stay in the EU, so it gave the Remain camp a six figure sum. In May of 2016, secret tapes revealed that Theresa May had visited Goldman’s London office and told them she agreed that the UK is better off in the EU. On several occasions, Goldman issued threats warning the PM that in the event of a No Deal Brexit, it will pull its thousands of staff out of the UK. That is just one financial institution. J P Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and others also have their foot firmly jammed in the door of government.
Then we have the big private corporations like Wallmart, BP, Berkshire Hathaway, Toyota, Apple, Exon Mobile etc, they too have a large say over government policy. For example, like the international banks, they too can fund individual MPs and bankroll whole political parties. If they don’t like what the party is doing, they can threaten to withdraw their funding and bankroll the opposition.
The banking/corporate cartell own newspapers groups that run selective stories which make people think, act and vote a certain way. And all this time, you thought you lived in a democracy.
In times past, monarchs and emperors would have been the richest and most powerful people in the world. William the Conqueror, Genghis Khan and Suleiman the Magnificent defeated opposing armies, commandeered land and resources and become rich beyond measure.
In later centuries, financiers and industrialists came to the fore. Stephen Girard, the Rothschild family and JD Rockefeller come to mind. Now the richest and arguably most powerful people in the world are the likes of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Mark Zuckerberg. The emperors, monarchs, barons, dukes and lords of old have all been deposed.
It can be seen that the post feudal, ‘democracy’ we are told we enjoy is in fact an illusion. It is an illusion because feudalism was never consigned to the dustbin of history. It is alive and well, and the banking/corporate elite are doing very well out of it. But why are the general public largely unaware of this new feudal power structure – this New World Order?
Considering the above graphic, and returning to the issue of states running up a ‘national debt’ – which is owed to ‘international finance’. The daily ‘interest’ payable on this loan is in fact a tax paid by workers to the families of the banking cartel who sit at the top of the feudal pyramid. In fact, the system is no different to the tribute paid by serfs to their medieval lords of old.
There was no single event that brought about the global transfer of power from monarchs to bankers. It happened over time, in different places in a variety of ways. In some cases, the elite achieved their goal by manipulating the masses into agitating for change, sometimes by orchestrating a revolution to depose the monarchical structure in the mistaken belief that the treasures of the realm would be more equitably distributed.
However, as ably demonstrated by Orwell’s Animal Farm, all that happens in such circumstances is the old aristocracy are replaced by a new one. The present banking and corporate elite has, over time, exploited those on the bottom of the feudal pyramid in order to eliminate a competing source of power at the top. The social and political turmoil the West now endures is a manifestation of this elite’s last great effort to consolidate their stranglehold on the West. In essence, they want to destroy nation states and create a globalised economy which can be better controlled and more efficiently exploited.
Protected by private security firms and jetting from one island fortress to another, this elite are insulated from the sea of social misery they create. Carved out of the nation states in which they reside, their gated communities’ mirror the social, economic, legal and political loopholes in which they operate. From their various domains, they look out upon the rest of the world with disdain – viewing it only as source of cheap servile labour and a well of resources to be plundered.
The roots of this new feudalism extend into the midst of time, but it is possible to pick up the story by considering that the liberals behind the French Revolution were financed by bankers, as were Bolshevik progressives during the Russian revolution. In both cases, the monarchical system was destroyed, and bankers filled the resultant power vacuum.
Today, the fact that billionaires fund socialism is covered up. This wasn’t always the case. This cartoon by Robert Minor appeared in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in 1911. It shows Karl Marx surrounded by enthusiastic Wall Street financiers: Morgan partner George Perkins, J.P. Morgan, John Ryan of National City Bank, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie. Immediately behind Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.
Shortly after the revolutionary upheavals in France came to a close, the Banque de France was created, and its shareholders were given exclusive rights to issue paper money, firstly in Paris, and later throughout the whole of France. Of course, those that control the credit of a nation, and charge interest on that credit, eventually control the nation. Likewise in Russia, after they had financed the turmoil, Wall Street financiers began investing heavily in a Russia where the labour force had been dispossessed of any rights.
French revolutionaries were inspired in part by the writings of professor Weishaupt, who had founded a secret order and revealed his most radical plans to only his closest confidents. Weishaupt suggested that mankind would best be served by eliminating monarchical rule, destroying the church, repealing all law, forbidding ownership of property, crushing patriotism and dispensing with nation states. If everyone was equal, he argued, there would be no competition, envy would cease to exist, conflict would end and mankind would live in eternal peace. This fantasy utopia is what our youth are being taught to believe in today.
Some years later this very same radical program was honed by Marx into his 1848 Communist Manifesto, and subsequently utilised by progressives like Trotsky and Lenin during the 1917 Russian Revolution. Today this ideology is known as communism.
The basic tenets of the Communist Manifesto are: 1. Destruction of Christian values, 2. Destruction of the family unit, 3.Abolition of national borders. 4. Elimination of separate nationalities. 5. Confiscation of private property. 6. Elimination of inheritance and the establishment of a One World Government run by appointees. In such circumstances, all of the world’s wealth would be harvested into the effective ownership of one very small group of powerful plutocrats at the top.
As it happens, these objectives mirror the aims of ‘the Illuminati’, ‘the Davos set’, ‘the Bildeburg group’, ‘the bankers’, ‘the Elite’, ‘the globalists’ or whatever else you chose to call the powerful forces at work who are self evidently pushing, in one form or another, for a One World Government.
Whether it is the UN, the EU, IMF, WHO, ICC, ECB or the World Bank, power is constantly ebbing away from nation states and into the hands of appointees who control these undemocratic institutions. Vested interests label this a conspiracy theory, but when there is a mass of evidence in support of a theory, it becomes a demonstrable fact.
This inexorable push towards global government is ably assisted by Western universities who churn out millions of progressives inculcated with cultural Marxist theory – and its twin sister, international communism. As explained in the entry for cultural Marxism, their irrational infatuations have been shaped by this ideological virus that was conceived in the 1920’s, transmuted into a destructive belief system and later carried into Western minds by progressive NGOs, pressure groups and think tanks paid for by today’s billionaire descendents of those who had funded the earlier communist revolutions.
This is where progressivism resembles a cult. For it has been proven time and time again that societies based on communist ideals cannot function, and the toll in human misery from attempts to implement this belief system is beyond comprehension. Yet the power exerted by academia’s communist cadre is such that their idealistic fantasies persist.
If we return to the graphic at the start of this post, you will notice that today’s feudal system has various levels based on a pyramid structure. Those on the lower levels know very little about what is happening on the one above, while those on the uppermost level know everything that is happening below them and are fully aware of what their real objectives are.
The politicians and technocrats on the mid tier are the paid stooges of those on the top. Their job is to socially engineer the world into that which their masters desire. To keep the masses below them malleable, they promise them a utopian future, while those above them know this to be false god. While some on the mid level believe in this message, others know different. Either way, they all get paid handsomely for destroying and reshaping their societies.
Tony Blair is a perfect example of a well-rewarded, mid tier stooge. Globalists financed his meteoric rise to power, which was characterised by all of the usual social justice sound-bites. Spurred on by a compliant media, the people fell for it in droves. When finally obtaining office he delivered on his promises… to the globalists.
The Iraq war served their interests. Meanwhile, Blair’s covert mass immigration program broke down the homogeny of British society, making it more cosmopolitan and therefore more amenable to the borderless one World Government desired by globalists. He swept away the hereditary earls and dukes of the House of Lords, replacing them with hand-picked members of the progressive and minority communities. People more likely to support the open borders globalists – albeit for entirely different reasons. As we mentioned earlier, this is how, over time, the British aristocracy has been replaced by an international bankocracy.
For serving the globalists cause, he was showered with status, patronage, honours and money. Lots of money. Upon leaving office, this ‘socialist’ acquired a large property empire, and was said to be worth up to £100 million.
And then there are those on the lowest tier of the pyramid. The ‘build bridges not walls’ activists, the global warming alarmists, the anti-fascist militants, the ‘refugees welcome here’ committees, Black Lives Matter, Stonewall, third wave feminists, Occupy Wall Street and the student Marxist associations. These are the remnants of a formerly unified society that the billionaire backed Frankfurt School has split into various identity groups, and then indoctrinated into believing they are oppressed by the White patriarchy. The lynchpin of Western civilisation they have been programmed to destroy.
Consumed by the cult of progressivism, they believe they are creating a borderless, de-racialised, world of peace and harmony on the model first developed by Weisheupot and re-formulated Marx. Their foolish idealism leaves them little room to consider that the turmoil they create, and the destruction they sow, merely advance the interests of their philanthropic plutocrats at the top of the pyramid.
“There is no proletarian, not even a communist, movement that has not operated in the interest of money, in the directions indicated by money, and for the time permitted by money – and that without the idealists amongst its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact.” (Oswald Spengler, The Decline of The West 1926)
If open borders/mass migration progressivism goes unchecked, and the powers of national governments continue to pass to a single central authority run by appointees, these street level activists will get their One World Government. But it won’t be anything like that which they envisaged,
The world will be governed by an unaccountable politburo appointed by shadowy plutocrats who could never be voted out of office or otherwise replaced. They would rule over a high surveillance, rigidly policed, culturally uniform, genetically homogenous proletariat living in a prison without walls – from which there would be no escape.
Therefore a governmental system that arrived in the guise of facilitating social justice would actually facilitate total exploitation of the masses by a tiny few. This was always the goal of naked capitalism. In other words, communism is capitalism on steroids.
The downfall of the White British people 