DEMOGRAPHIC DECLINE
“Starting with unlimited freedom, I conclude with unlimited despotism”
Dostoevksy
Extensive genetic research carried out within the British Isles led Dr Stephen Oppenheimer to conclude: “The genetic evidence shows that three quarters of our ancestors came to this corner of Europe as hunter-gatherers, between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago.”(Prospect Magazine, Oct 21 2006)
In spite of recent attempts by the progressive UK media and education system to falsely backdate the presence of a large non-white community in the UK, academics working for the Council of Europe estimate that in 1950 there were no more than 20,000 non-white residents in the United Kingdom, mainly in England and almost all born overseas. ( The Demographic Characteristics of Immigrant Populations by Haug, Werner; Compton, Paul Council of Europe 2002).
Up until 1950, the UK was a largely homogenous community with a shared history, unifying culture and strong national identity. There were no large scale grooming gangs, acid attacks, suicide bombers or White British dispossession.
Research conducted in 2010 by David Coleman, Emeritus Professor of Demography at Oxford University, predicted that if the then, current migration trends continued, the White British will become a minority in Britain by around 2066. He said this would “represent an enormous change to national identity – cultural, political, economic and religious“. (Prospect Magazine Nov 17th 2010).
Prof. Coleman’s published research included a graph showing how the White British population will decline at given migratory trends. The Standard Projection figure, as outlined in red on the graph, set net inward migration at 180,000 annually. The graph is shown here:
Although not referenced in the little media coverage there was, Professor Coleman’s report stated: “If the changes projected here came to pass, they would be perhaps the biggest unintended consequence of government action—or inaction—in our history. It would be curious if embarrassment or demographic ignorance permitted an old society to marginalise itself in its own homeland without discussing it. In a democracy it is surely appropriate, at the very least, for these considerations, for good or ill, to be at the forefront of debate on migration—not the short-term interests of employers and others grown dependent on migration in our distorted economy.”
Two important issues arise from this data, and from Professor Coleman’s musings. Firstly, since his research was published, net migration has risen sharply from the 180,000 Standard Projection figure indicated in red on his graph. Having peaked at 330,000 to year end March 2015, the last set of figures to June 2018 reveal that net inward migration stands at 273,000 annually.
By superimposing these figures onto Professor Coleman’s graph, and assuming that these migration patterns continue, the White British will be virtually non-existent well before 2101, and extinct shortly after.
Secondly, Professor Coleman gracefully assumes that the demographic decline, and eventual extinction, of the White British ethnic group is an ‘unintended consequence’ of successive UK government policies.
Anecdotal evidence, legislative measures, applied policy and other data suggests that this is not the case. In fact, the evidence reveals that successive UK governments have been engaged in a systematic effort, both overt and covert, to make the extinction of the White British ethnic group inevitable.
Taking measures that will result in the inevitable extinction of a racial or ethnic group is contrary to international law, and comes very close to the UN definition of genocide, where genocide means “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of like calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
Article I of the UN Convention on the Protection and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide states that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of a peaceful situation. The same article states that it is the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide.
BACKGROUND
After inhabiting, and indeed prospering, within the British Isles for many thousands of years, the decline/replacement of the White British people began shortly after WWII with the arrival in Britain of hundreds of West Indians. It seems as though something happened around this time that set in motion the decline in the fortunes of the White British. Was it the war itself? Or was it the outcome of the war that determined the fate of the White British? What entity emerged from the war with hatred enough to inflict this heinous crime upon an entire race?
What is happening in Britain is also happening throughout white Western civilisation. In the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, Whites are rapidly being replaced by non-Whites. In these places too, the sharp decline in the percentage of whites to non-whites started just after WWII. Up until that period, white birth rates were high, and the white populations of the world had been growing.
My mother was one of eight, so too was my father. But now the white birth rate is below replacement level, the White British are heading for extinction and there is a complete news blackout. This demographic collapse is only happening in white countries. In Africa, China, India etc the birth rates are above replacement level. That in itself, should pose a worthwhile challenge for the academic world – but not one single intellectual or institution has applied their critical thinking to this mass extinction. How can this be? It is almost like some higher power is inhibiting the academic world from investigating the biggest mass extinction in human history.
And yet much time and expense is spent investigating the plight of great crested newts. Indeed, they are a European Protected Species, and it is an offence to damage, destroy or obstruct any place a great crested newt uses for breeding purposes. Not so for the White British. Their habitat can be destroyed, and they can be cleared from their land without anyone raising so much as an eyebrow. The “dark forces in this country“, as alluded to by the Queen, clearly have more regard for a newt.
When people ask why this is happening, they are told a variety of things. It’s down to whites dying earlier, or having lower birth rates, or inward migration or a combination of all three. These are symptoms, not the cause. Other symptoms include the promotion of feminism, consumerism, same sex relationships, destruction of the family unit, the lowering of white wages, lack of job insecurity and minority preference. So too do articles, movies, television shows and adverts promoting mixed race relationships. And always in the background is the insidious Critical Theory drumbeat of the Marxists, with their ‘whites are racist’ chants and messages of hate saying the world would be better off without them. All this, and more, combine to lower the West’s fertility.
‘The media’ tell whites they are all bad, real bad. So bad in fact that they must be eradicated from the planet.
Whites suffer these racial attacks from academia and the media day in and day out.
Media articles in the West urging whites to remain childless in order to ‘save the planet’ also contribute to a reduction in the white birth rate. Likewise with the constant plugging of stories that concentrate on the burdens imposed on white parents by raising a child – and comparing that life to the hedonistic, high flying lifestyle they could enjoy if they remained childless.
Have you ever noticed that today’s adverts usually feature a white woman with a non-white man? Yet articles and adverts urging couples to remain childless show a white woman and a white man, or just a white woman. Advertising executives spend millions ensuring they target the right audience. Who owns the media? Do you think this is all a coincidence?
These adverts are an attempt to convert whites to the ‘pro-choice’/Planned Parenthood movements. Spawned from a marriage of 20th century feminism and cultural Marxist theory, their approach to pregnancy is that the unborn child has no rights, and a woman has the right to kill the unborn child if its birth will inconvenience her in any way. For example, if it might jeopardise her career prospects or the due date is during a pre-booked holiday.
This ‘female empowerment’ attitude has been inculcated only into the Western mindset, and is yet another method by which cultural Marxists achieve a reduction in the white birth rate. In fact, every single reason for the present reduction in the white birth rate can be traced back to the ongoing implementation of policies originating from the anti-white hatreds of those working out of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory.
In Canada the drive to lower the white birth rate came from Henekh “Henry” Morgentaler, an embittered survivor of a Nazi concentration camp who emigrated to Canada after the war. Morgentaler spent the remainder of his life carrying out vasectomies on Canadian men, abortions on Canadian women and challenging the law to expand the opportunities for Canadian women to kill their unborn children.
Although admitting to carrying out thousands of illegal abortions, and being jailed for his crimes, Morgentaler was portrayed in the progressive media as a champion of womens rights, and in 2008 Morgentaler was awarded the Order of Canada for,”his commitment to increased healthcare for women, and his leadership in humanist and civil liberties organisations.”
Canadian women now abort one million babies every ten years. In 2007 Canada’s Somali born Immigration Minister said Canada need to import one million immigrants from the third world to fill labour shortages.
By inverting reality, and manipulating white public opinion, the Canadian mass media created the mentality that now results in whites being replaced by non-whites. This is cultural Marxism in action. But who owns the media?
In 1960, the population of Nigeria was 45 million. By 2015 this had grown to 180 million and is expected to reach 400 million by 2050. Why were there no Dr Morgentalers operating in Africa? The forces working to stem population growth in White society are not interested in stemming the population growth of Africa. Is this pure coincidence?
Everywhere we look, the pressure on white people is rising. There are increasing signs of those in positions of power wanting to make whites irrelevant, make them invisible, make them go away. Last month I visited my local Specsavers, and noticed 17 large pictorial adverts. There were three pictures of smiling couples – all white women with non white partners. There were individual pictures of men – all non white. There were pictures of white and mixed race women and children. There were no pictures of happy white families or smiling white men. Is this pure coincidence?.
Removing whites from adverts is a conscious decision taken by the company and the advertising executives. The subliminal message is, your time is over. This is happening all over the high street and media. It is almost as if some powerful entity, some hidden force, has issued an anti-white fatwa.
Log on to Google Search and type in ‘images of Black inventors’, and pictures of black inventors appear. Now type in ‘images of white inventors’ and images of black inventors appear. It seems that Rutherford, the Wright Brothers, Edison, Marconi, Tesla, Newton et al never existed.
They are tearing down our statues, renaming our festivals, remodeling our literature and rewriting history – and whites are not going to feature in it. When whites become a minority, the pressure will be stepped up. Whites might be compelled to marry non-whites, or be sterilised. Think that is excessive? Try asking the ethnic Russians before the minority-driven Bolshevik revolution if they thought upwards of 30 million of their kith and kin would fall victim to state persecution.
You will see from the evidence that there is already an openly permissive hatred of whites today. And that overt hatred exists with whites as a majority in Western countries. It will increase as white numbers decrease.
These ideological driven search results are determined by Google operators manipulating the search algorithm. Google is a globalist enterprise, as such it has a cultural Marxist philosophy embedded within it. As we know from our webpage on this subject, the purpose of cultural Marxism is to destroy the West by undermining the white society that built it. The best way to undermine white society is to make whites go away, both on the internet and in reality.
Once again, Google: ‘images of black couple’, and pictures of perfectly normal black heterosexual couples are shown. Now Google ‘images of white couple’, and mixed race couples, whites with black babies, homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders are shown. This is Cultural Marxism in operation, and its short term purpose is to tell young white people that this behaviour is all perfectly normal. Its long term purpose is to undermine the white family unit, and ultimately destroy white civilisation. In the present climate, white europeans can be called racist, or extinct. Pick one.
These are all symptoms of the problem, not the cause. The real questions to ask are; why are whites not reproducing fast enough? Why is mass migration happening? Why are whites being told they are evil? Why are whites not being fairly represented in adverts and on the internet? Why is their history being re-written, or phased out? Why, all of a sudden, are same sex and mixed race relationships being overly promoted in white society? Why is there a sudden infatuation with transgenderism? And why did this only start happening after 1945?
After thousands of years of high fertility, societal growth, technological innovation and global expansion, whites will be rendered virtually extinct within the space of 150 years – and no one is taking any steps to halt this mass extinction. It is almost like some entity, some hidden powerful force has ordained it – and is now taking steps to prevent remedial measures from being taken.
Very often, powerful entities cannot be seen. Their presence can only be detected by the quantifiable effect they have on their surroundings. For example, in astrophysics, a powerful Black Hole cannot be seen, but its presence is detected because an accumulation of data in any given vicinity points to its existence. The same happens in the murky world of politics.
It was always said that those who suggested the Bilderberg Group were plotting World Government were conspiracy theorists. The group released no information about its activities; so researchers had to rely on an accumulation of external data to draw their conclusions. In the fullness of time, and as can be seen by examining the facts detailed on this website, they were proved right.
This is why we now postulate that, given the extra-ordinary circumstances surrounding the sudden and rapid decline and (seemingly) inevitable extinction of the white race comprising almost 1 billion people, there must be a very powerful, but hidden, malign force at work. Is it an active conspiracy or are individuals with the same ideas and beliefs working with no coordination toward a common goal? Only you can be the judge of that.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you cannot criticise”.
The downfall of the White British people 