“EU citizens cannot push a European government out of power and hold an EU political party properly to account… the union has been suspicious toward any expression of popular sovereignty. In practice, EU participatory channels are not intended to impact directly how decisions are made, but simply to legitimize existing policy approaches. The clock is ticking: either the EU institutions provide meaningful participatory, user-friendly opportunities to their citizens or the EU as it exists now could soon all be over.” Alberto Alemanno, Jean Monnet Professor of EU Law. Carnegie Europe (abridged) Dec.5th 2018
The shift towards global government has been an incremental process, but for the UK, one major step forward occurred when it joined the EU (formerly the EEC). Here, unelected EU Commissioners serve the interests of the EU and its globalisation strategy, and not the interests of the nations they hail from. This is written into the EU Constitution, and it is the engine that drives ‘ever increasing union’.
Ever increasing union necessitates a progressive transfer of power and sovereignty to Brussels until such times as the member state has very limited powers and is effectively no longer sovereign. This process is achieved in a myriad of ways, and each turn of the screw makes it harder for member nations to free themselves.
To achieve full union, EU operatives lie, deceive, blackmail and bribe their way forward. If a nation doesn’t vote the way it wants, it pressurises them to vote again (Ireland). If a nation doesn’t submit to its will, it invites its friends to manipulate the markets (Italy). If a nation is intending to vote down a change in the EU constitutional, it refashions its objective into an administrative exercise that does not require the people’s consent (Lisbon Treaty).
It deploys its kangaroo court to make politicised rulings, as in the recent ruling that criticism of Mohammad is blasphemy, yet nothing is said about protecting the Christian prophet. A hastily cobbled up European Court of Justice edict permitting the UK to unilaterally rescind Article 50 was issued in record time only to give succour to its UK fifth column. And as we see in France, its paid stooges use extreme violence to impose the EU’s will on the repressed peoples of Europe.
In 1973, the UK was taken into the EEC, now EU, by Prime Minister (and Bildeberg member) Edward Heath. The British people were not consulted.
During the course of debate running up to the UK joining the EEC, the leadership of the British Labour Party, in an unspoken conspiratorial alliance with the Conservative Party and media interests, withheld from the public domain a central tenet of the Treaty of Rome, namely: Article 3c: The abolition, as between member states, of all obstacles to freedom of movement for people”. This is evidenced by newspaper articles available for inspection from the online British Library, and by the Hansard record of parliamentary debate shown below.
“Even the Economist agrees that the Common Market is not much more than a particular commercial set-up covering six out of 24 European countries.” (Shadow Defence Secretary , Fabian Society and Bilderberg member Denis Healey MP. Oct 21 1971 Hansard)
“But the case for entry, as I think the right hon. Gentleman admitted today, must depend overwhelmingly on economic considerations. It is, after all, an economic community at present and nothing more.” (Denis Healey MP. Oct 21 1971 Hansard)
“Those of us who are not happy about the political aspects of the Common Market have these doubts. I hope that my hon. Friend will explain why the pamphlet says so little about these matters and that he will be able to set our minds at rest.” (Joan Hall MP. Hansard July 27 1971)
Likewise in 1975, when the British people were asked whether or not they wanted to stay or leave the EEC; leading politicians and a complicit media again portrayed that body as being merely a trading organisation. They knew full well that freedom of movement [open borders) was already enshrined in the Treaty of Rome, but they kept this out of the public domain.
In the UK House of Parliament, Newport MP Roy Hughes summed it up when he said,”The whole Common Market Business was simply steam-rolled through the house and put through without the full hearted consent of the British people. We know that for a long time, every national newspaper has been greatly in favour of the Common Market. They have exercised all manner of distortions and censorship to point out its merits.” (Hansard 11th March 1975)
With the White British people now locked into the EU, each EU expansion, ostensibly to poorer countries, paved the way for millions more migrants to enter the UK. As the enlargements were formalised by Treaty, the British people were never given the opportunity to withhold their consent. Mass inward migration was forced upon the White British people irrespective of their wishes.
The people were fed the lie that it was merely a six nation economic zone, but the plan all along was for the UK to be swallowed up by a monolithic super-state that now comprises 28 nations, and has plans to ensnare North Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, and thereby double in size.
How does the EU conduct a policy of imperialism, yet retain its liberal support? How can its agents attempt to overturn the 2016 expressed will of the British people, and nothing is said? How can the EU’s leadership state that its policy is to ensure that no part of Europe remains White, and there be no outcry? It is because the EU has established within the UK a vast interlocking network of propagandists, subversives, agitators, spies and informants.
This operation mirrors the strategy and emulates the practices of The Department of Agitation and Propaganda arm of the Central Committee Secretariat of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Established in the 1920’s, and later renamed The Ideological Department, it was responsible for educating the masses into accepting Bolshevik authority. Now termed ‘Agiprop’, a century later, the core functionality and over-riding aim remains the same.
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas.” G. Brock Chisholm, co-founder of the World Federation for Mental Health, former director of UN World Health Organization
Within the UK, EU Agiprop determines the content of all official EU related information, oversees political education in schools, watches over all forms of mass communication and thereby indoctrinates the masses into accepting EU hegemony.
EU policies and strategies are very often formulated, peer approved and rolled out by a large network of politicised NGOs (non-government organisations), think tanks, pressure groups, pseudo-charities and activists – often jointly funded by the socialist EU and capitalist ventures like the Rockefeller Foundation and Sorus’s Open Society.
One such organisation is the London School of Economics (LSE). Founded by the socialist Fabian Society, and part funded by the EU (18 million Euros in the past nine years) Rockefeller Foundation ($850,000 in 2017), Carnegie Corporation ($550,000 in 2018) and other multi-national corporations, this globalist think tank has 27 humanities departments and institutes – including Gender Studies, Social Policy, Sociology.
The LSE’s International Inequalities Institute and European Institute work in close harmony with the European Union – which provides substantial grant aid in return. The European Institute itself has four sub-departments: Political Economy in Europe, Governance and Democracy in the European Union, European Society and Europe Beyond the EU.
A current European Society theme is ‘Islamification of Germany’. On its webpage there is a LSE book for sale: BEING GERMAN – BECOMING MUSLIM, which celebrates up to 100,000 German females turning to Islam. The website write up is as follows:
“Recent speeches by some of Europe’s political leaders have called into question the merits of multiculturalism as a response to Europe’s increasingly diverse societies.”
“While mainstream politicians steer clear of any suggestion that Europe should abandon its commitment to ‘unity in diversity’, there is a rising tide of ‘populist’ rhetoric which warns that Europe’s identity – an identity supposedly forged by its ‘cultural, religious and humanist inheritance’ – is threatened by the presence of migrant, and especially Muslim, communities, and the prospect of Turkish EU membership.”
Even within this short paragraph, by calling into question the existence of a European cultural inheritance, this globalist funded School of anti-nation state propaganda reveals its prejudice. In essence, this outfit, under the guise of academic excellence, undertakes lectures, carries out seminars, and produces reports, books and other literature intended to move decision makers into line with the aims of its globalist paymasters. It has all the appearance of a Stop Me and Buy One academic charade. But what do you expect when it has Angelina Jolie as a visiting professor?
The LSE’s website has a history timeline showing that its founders were Fabians, Beatrice and Sidney Webb. What the history timeline does not show you is that in 1932, they went on a ‘fact finding’ tour of Soviet Russia. The result was a 1000 page tome entitled Soviet Communism: A new Civilisation? No mention was made of the forced relocations of entire ethnic groups to unpopulated regions, the mass extra-judicial executions of untold millions, the genocidal starvations and the operation of the Gulag forced labour and re-education camps. It was pure socialist propaganda, and the Fabians who gave birth to the LSE expected it to continue their work.
Even in its early days, the billionaire’s dream of World Government was being promoted through the LSE’s International Relations Department, where former Progressive Party member Philip Noel-Baker ran courses labelled, “International organisation for the promotion of common political and economic interest”. Noel-Baker was involved in establishing the League of Nations, forerunner to the UN, which is itself a central driver of One World Government. The School also promoted Fabian books on International Government (1916).
However, socialism is clearly a marketable commodity for the LSE has a billion pound endowment and, according to a 2014 global census of US dollar billionaires, it has educated more billionaires that any other comparable institution. Not bad for a body established to help the poor.
Demos, Chatham House, The Institute for Public Policy Research, The New Economic Foundation, Lord Sainsbury’s Centre for Progressive Studies and so many other socialist think tanks operate in similar ways. All market themselves as ‘alternative entry points’ into the political process. Like the LSE, these well funded organisations establish the networks, hold the events and produce the skewed reports that progressive politicians, and their complicit media, use to drive the globalist agenda forward.
Working alongside these privately funded ‘alternative entry points’, the EU itself has a number of in-house, propaganda laboratories. Its Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS), which markets itself as the “only progressive think tank at European level”, lists 47 partner think tanks in Europe. The three UK partners are The Fabian Society, Policy Network and Mutuo.
It is revealing that FEPS should include the Fabian Society as a partner, for the early Fabian leadership had advocated the destruction of British culture with lectures entitled “Civilisation: Its Cause and Cure” (1889); while leading Fabian George Bernard Shaw admired mass murderer Stalin, once describing him as “a Georgian gentleman with no malice in him”. (Stanley Weintraub, GBS and the Despots 2011).
FEPS suggests that the following scenario is figment of the Western xenophobes imagination: “In many Western European countries and in other parts of the wealthier Global North the fear of incoming migrants is rapidly turning into a collective obsession. Fed by unscrupulous propaganda, proliferating fake news, daily unfiltered information, an increasing number of people believe that if governments do not stop migration flows for good (little or no difference is made between refugees, regular or irregular migrants), migrants will storm their territory, stealing their jobs and corrupting their cultures. Some even believe that the coasts of North Africa are literally crowded with people ready to embark to Europe and invade the Old Continent as part of an obscure “globalist” conspiracy that aims at replacing European labour with cheaper Africans workers”. (‘Prioritising People: A Progressive narrative for Migration’, Sept. 2017)
FEPS says it is an “Incubator for fresh ideas”, and “embodies a new way of thinking on the social-democratic, socialist and labour scene”. This body is unashamedly in favour of international socialism.
On its ‘Progressive Post’ page, there is a short interview with professor Philippe Van Parijs. Discussing the concept of a Universal Basic Income Parijs says, “We need to change the distribution of income. These incomes derive from the wealth produced by capital accumulation and previous innovations, and should therefore be distributed to all citizens of a society. A basic income is part of this logic.” (January 28, 2019)
Parijs is saying that those with wealth must give it to those without wealth. Although this is full-on Marxism, you can rest assured that this communistic policy would not dent the finances of the Elite who bankroll socialism. As witnessed in all socialist countries, redistribution of wealth is only for the lower orders.
A Universal Basic Income is essentially non-means tested, ‘free’ money for all, whether a citizen works or not. Not only is that a real bonus for the banking and corporate elite who want to attract ever more third world migrants to Europe, but they will also profit from the interest payable on the additional loans made to countries whose national debt will inevitably rise because of it.
FEPS produces research papers, holds conferences, conducts seminars and acts as a networking facility for socialist think tanks, academics and politicians. Although taxpayer funded, like the Bilderberg Group conspiracy, many of its sessions are closed to the press and public. What else are they hiding?
STREET LEVEL AGIPROP
We have seen how the globalist ethos is first generated, and then impregnated into systems of national government. But how does this message filter down to the ‘man on the Clapham omnibus’?
Firstly, through a leftist occupied education system that produces uncritical multi-cult drones. Secondly, though a largely compliant media that markets itself as a free press, but is in fact monopolised by the forces of globalism. Lastly by endless UN climate, migration and human rights treaties (intended to foster a ‘world community’ approach), and a labyrinth of EU ‘outreach’ programmes.
The great mass of the general public will never know that their taxes fund a myriad of EU backed institutions, lesser organisations and minor sub groups that, through strategic training programmes, granting of endowments, seminars, community events and other schemes, mould community thinking to its globalist will. This Europe wide network has been built specifically to facilitate migration into the EU, undermine the cohesiveness of nation states, bring about their demise and herald the progressives much sought after One World Government.
First, the EU funds two large, pan-European, umbrella groups: The ‘European Network Against Racism’ (ENAR) and ‘United Against Nationalism, Racism and in Support of Migrants and Refugees’ (UAR).
The over-riding ethos is, “support migrants and minorities” and crush ‘fascism and nationalism’ – which means anyone opposed to their globalist agenda. These organisations do not oppose communism.
Each of these EU umbrella groups has dozens of sub groups, which in turn have dozens of affiliate groups. In essence, the two umbrella organisations finance hundreds of groups and thousands of activists – who are all, in their own way, using Critical Theory and Identity Politics to attack and undermine the nation state.
As we write this, the ENAR website themes are: “Honouring Black Europe”, “Race and Mental Health” and “Democracy Under Attack”. The site has a live feed, where the current story is, “Muslim woman in niqab denied entry onto bus with her child in London”.
Following the Critical Theory play book, the whole site is dedicated to portraying the West as inherently racist. The underlying message is: we need more minority rights legislation, more minority preference schemes and more minorities in order to defeat the scourge of White fascism. It is 100% anti-Western propaganda.
One entry on the website says “Our solidarity with the people marching against Australia Day and its glorified celebration of the genocide of Aborigines”. The fact this organisation is helping to rid Europe of indigenous Europeans is ignored. It is pure Frankfurt School.
The ENAR gathers ‘equality data’, which is used to facilitate minority preferment. It monitors and records “racist crime and speech”, and pushes for sanctions against those who oppose the EU/UN drive to force mass migration onto the West. The organisation invents new fields of discrimination to pursue, and creates new phobias to charge the indigenous population with ie. Antigypsium and Afrophobia.
The organisation boasts how it worked with a well funded organisation called ‘A Jewish Contribution to an Inclusive Europe’ (CEJI) to recruit 10,000 online ‘hate crime’ informers. This Orwellian arrangement sees people from favoured groups patrolling the internet in the hope of finding offence so they can report the, usually, White European author to the thought police, who have powers to intimidate, criminalise, convict and jail speech code transgressors even when there is no supporting evidence. This classic devolution of mass surveillance to civilian informers would have made the Stasi feel proud.
For their part, the thought police have been re-educated by the Common Purpose led, diversity industry and are now pre-programmed to always view the White British, and their identity, despite all evidence to the contrary, as the primary danger.
ENAR works on the Critical Theory proposition that White people are inherently racist, so for the good of humanity they need replacing with non-Whites who can never be racist, ENAR is supported by Greenpeace, Trade Unions, Friends of the Earth, Coco-Cola, L’Oreal, Runnymede Trust, WWF etc.
ENAR member organisations include: European Movement International, Churches Commission for Migrants in Europe, African Diaspora Youth Network in Europe, European Network of Women of African Descent, European Forum of Muslim Women etc. It also lists International Federation of Resistance Fighters – Association of Antifascists (FIR).
We remain unsure about the degree of cross-pollination between this group of ‘antifascists’, and the balaclava wearing, pick axe carrying Antifascist mobs who freely advertise their rent a mob services on UK Facebook pages.
The ENAR website has a continually updated list of possible Antifa targets. It might be a conservative MP’s book signing, an academic lecture on intelligence, a Leave Means Leave rally, a political meeting, a Christian based court case or any other facet of Western society they oppose.
The mob turn up, there is a threat of violence, the event is closed and opposing voices are pummelled into silence. For these people are the globalist’s foot-soldiers, the street enforcers – the lefts Brownshirts.
The 2017 ENAR Annual Report discloses that 70% of its funding comes from the European Commission, and 13.6% comes from global Czar of chaos, George Sorus. Without knowing it, EU tax payers are funding their own repression and demographic demise.
CONTROL OF PRESS
The EU is pouring millions of pounds into organisations that advocate state control of the press. For many, the funding — uncovered by Telegraph journalist Andrew Gilligan – is yet further evidence of the EU’s increasingly authoritarian nature. The Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky has for years referred to the organization as the EUSSR.
Angered by some UK press hostility to the EU, one recipient of European taxpayers’ money, Mediadem, for example, has been given 2.3 million pounds to help bring about the “co-ordination of the journalistic profession at the European level.”
Mediadem’s Dr Craufurd Smith opines, “Liberal conceptions of media freedom focus on editorial freedom for government interference…. [however] states may also be required to take positive measures to curtail the influence of powerful economic or political groups…. this entails that neither the media, nor those individuals who own or work for the media, enjoy an absolute right to freedom of expression.”
This is not the first time the EU has sought to control freedom of expression. In 2001, the European Court of Justice ruled that the EU was allowed to suppress political criticism of its institutions and of leading figures. The court ruled that the EU was lawfully allowed to punish individuals who “damaged the institution’s image and reputation.”
The European Court of Justice is the EU’s highest court. Its advocate general, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, once argued that a book criticizing EU financial policy was akin to extreme blasphemy, and thus not protected by free speech laws.
A later report from the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) said there was an increase in ‘hate speech’ and racist violence in the UK from 2009 to March 2016. The report took no account of the fact that the definition of ‘hate speech’ had been widened in that period, and the thought police had been ordered to find more ‘victims’ to justify more legislation that would place further limits on permitted speech.
Blaming the press for speech violations, and not the EU’s drive to ethnically cleanse the White British from their homeland via a process of mass migration, ECRI Chair Christian Ahlund, said: “It is no coincidence that racist violence is on the rise in the UK at the same time as we see worrying examples of intolerance and hate speech in the newspapers, online and even among politicians.”
The report made 23 recommendations to Theresa May’s Government calling for changes to criminal law, the freedom of the press, crime reporting and equality law so the replacement of the White British people could proceed without the discomfort of hearing their complaints. How long will this site remain on the web?
On Jan 27th 2019, in a move straight out of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union’s playbook, the EU announced moves to silence those who expose its strategy and agenda. Activated by a mere 49 votes in the inner Politburo of the EU ‘Foreign Affairs Committee’, the commissars immediately activated the Orwellian ‘EastStratCom task force‘ and issued the following urgent diktat:
“ROBUST RESPONSE REQUIRED. The Committee wants the EU and its member states to adopt a firm response to tackling the increasingly sophisticated tools used by opinion formers and state-controlled institutions to spread disinformation, for example via private messaging apps, search engine optimisation, artificial intelligence and on-line news portals and TV-stations.”
The resolution also orders:
- All EU countries that continue to deny the existence of disinformation and hostile propaganda, as well as its impact on public opinion, should recognise them, evaluate the situation within their territory and take proactive measures in order to counteract and debunk it,
- The EU and its member states should consider developing a legal framework both at EU and international level for tackling hybrid threats, also covering targeted sanctions against those responsible for orchestrating and implementing disinformation campaigns,
- the actions of social media companies, messenger services and search engine providers should be regulated to ensure their full transparency,
- Technology companies should invest more in tools identifying propaganda and ensure better identity checks of platform users, in order to eliminate botnets as well as reducing financial incentives for those who profit from disinformation,
- outsourcing propaganda and use of multiplying tools by hostile third parties should be investigated in more depth,
- publicly naming the perpetrators and the goals they seek to achieve, and also publicising all debunked cases of hostile propaganda accompanied with a detailed factsheet,
- urgently turning the EU’s East StratCom Task Force into a fully-fledged unit or even a bigger structure within the European External Action Service (EEAS), as well as providing all three EEAS Strategic Communication Task Forces with adequate financial and p
EU CHILD PROPAGANDA
In 2012 a video emerged of Judith Schilling, the European Commission’s publication manager, handing out EU-focused leaflets at an Education Show in Birmingham. She is heard telling an interviewer, “’Everybody has now picked up on the idea that we will never succeed to convince people about the value of being a member of the European Union if we do not start early enough with the young people before they form prejudices and are misinformed by other sources.‘
The Times Education Supplement revealed that the EU was handing free comics containing pro-EU propaganda to schoolchildren in British schools. One cartoon features a boy raising his hand stating: “My Dad says that Europe is a waste of money.” The teacher then assures the boy that his dad is wrong. This is how the EU turns the young against older, worldly wise, members of the family. This is why Remainers want to lower the voting age.
The cartoons present only a positive image of the EU. There is no mention of how the EU is undemocratic, and how it has wasted billions of pounds on vanity projects. There is no reference to the fact that EU migration policies are turning Europe into ethnic battlegrounds, European cities into places that resemble a cross between Lahore and Mogadishu and that given time; the child asking the question in class will be the only White European in his class.
The comic will not convey to children the thoughts of EU Commissioner for Migration Dimitris Avramopoulos, that programming Europeans to welcome mass migration is “a moral imperative”. (POLITICO: Europe’s Migrants Are Here to Stay).
The EU created Captain Euro to convince schoolchildren the EU was a force for good, and inform them that their future prosperity and safety relied on them being EU citizens. The comic strip characters arch enemy is Dr Divider – the villain who seeks to divide the EU into different nations and peoples. The EU has said it relies on facts, and sees children as an entry point into families who may hold prejudices. Dr Divider could be the child’s mum or granddad.
Here Captain Euro factually battles the UK’s evil Brexiteers:
The EU insists it only uses our taxpayer money to present facts to schoolchildren.
The downfall of the White British people 